(1) Why are military officers underpaid ?
As per MMS not being IMF (US) agent --- he became FinMin
because IMF had put a condition before PVNR and ABV, and Indian elitemen that
IMF will bail out India ONLY if MMS is made FinMin. IOW, commons of India or
MPs of India did NOT make him FinMin, IMF did,
Army men are NOT highest paid, but in US etc they are
well paid. eg in US soldiers get far more than policemen. In India too, they
were well paid till 1990.
Now in India, they are paid peanuts compared to even
policemen and similar skill level in private sector.
There is no clause in Constitution which says that
salaries of military offiers MUST be linked with corresponding position in
police. This guideline was made by Indira Gandhi, looooong back in early 1970s
when corruption in police was not all that high and values of perks military
got (central school, army public schools, clubs, pensions, plots etc) was very
high compared to perks people got in private sector and police. By 1991, it was
clear that soldier was getting LESS paid than a policeman and IAS even if all
perks are included.
So in 1991, it was to time to change the guideline that
linked salaries of soldiers with IPS. Salaries of soldiers should have been
linked with official and presumed unofficial incomes of IPS. But MMS insisted
that soldiers MUST not be paid more than policemen's official salary, and
refused to raised salaries. He was no fool. He knew that IAS/IPS's salaries are
now imaterial given the bribes they make.
The PMs and FinMins have CONSISTENTLY followed a wrong
policy of under-paying soldiers for 16 years. Not 1-2 years, but 16 years.
Thats too long a time to make genuine mistake. Whatever they did, now soldiers
are highly demoralized. Less pay, and volley of insults from MNC-agents like
ToI has created a volcano waiting to erupt.
(1)
Does corruption reduce with increasing salaries of judges and officials?
In
small cases, judges avoid taking bribes because there is risk of getting caught
and not much money to be made. And in large case, they almost always take
bribes. The solution is JurySys, Right to Recall judges, CITIZENS VOICE, Imprisonment
by Majority Approval, Fines by Majority Approval.
there
was never a reason for Ministers, IAS, IPS, judges to take bribes. And even if
salaries go 10 times, they will keep taking bribes unless we citizens have
procedures to expel, imprison, execute, fine them. Money is not a replacement
of punishment.
In
US, in 1950s, salaries of Govt officials did not increase at inflation rate. So
officers didnt resort to bribes --- they started quitting. Because the Recall,
JurySys ensured that if they take bribes, they would be land in prison. And as
they started quitting, citizens increased the salaries and also offered option
to re-join. IOW, when corruption is low, salaries etc automatically increase.
(2)
IS POVERTY MAIN CAUSE OF CORRUPTION?
Even
the lowest level in Govt is far better off compared to 80% of most commons. And
if poverty was a reason why a neta-babu-judge-policemen takes bribes, then he
would have stopped after making initial few lakhs, but we see that the bribe
collection never decreases it only increases.
There
are many Govt dept where procedures are so right that Govt employee gets no
opportunity to collect bribes. eg consider a bank clerk. He has to pass the
cheque in 1-2 days or return it. He has no discretion. So he does not take bribes
and lives with lesser money compared to clerks in revenue dept who literally
make Rs 100,000 to Rs 10,00,000 in bribes. Now both clerks come from similar
background, and yet the bank clerk learns to be content with situation and
accepts a mediocre living. Whereas the revenue dept clerk who has opportunity
and no fear of punishment runs amok.
And
yes, power is so much concentrated at top in that everyone desperately wants
himself and his relatives to reach top spots in judocracy, netadom, babudom
etc.
(3)
People get the government they deserve?
Questioner:
Once so happened, I booked some items in the luggage van of railways. ...
You
are giving examples where stakes are in peanuts. Give examples where stakes are
high.
Say
you are running a factory. And pollution control guy comes and asks for bribes
or threatens to shut down the factory. What you gonna do, what you gonna do?
If
you dont pay bribe, he will shut down his factory. Your orders would go for a
toss. The wages and interest costs will keep adding without revenue. The
clients will walk away and may never come back again if you fail to keep
delivery commitments.
So
will you dare to refuse to pay bribe?
-----------------
IOW,
please confine to situations where stakes are high. Any 2 bit guy can whose
stakes no more than peanuts can yell "see, I sacrificed peanuts, but did
not bend principles". Big deal !!!
---
In
one way, you can/should see these criminals as satellites of IPS/judges.
IPS/judges want to collect bribes from businesses, but they cant as collecting
bribes from 100s of business would expose them. So they sponsor criminals,
offer them protection and ask them to collect haftas. You think that criminals
took away your money. But 90% of what these criminals make goes top IPS, MLAs,
Ministers, CM and judges.
And
those who haven't paid bribes, are no saints. Many of them shamelessly support
laws that create situations in administration where-in a businessmen etc is
forced to pay bribes.
eg
Consider the law that "judge would give verdict and not the Jury".
Many of those who take pride in not paying bribes shamelessly support this bad
law. Situation? The judge tells the aasil "you better hire my
relative/friend as lawyer, or I will harass you to death". What choice
does aasil have?
Those
who support bad laws should be seen at par with those who are paying and taking
bribes.
Do
people get the judges they deserve?
Do
people get the IAS/IPS they deserve?
I
would focus on following statement of yours "they(IAS/IPS/Neta/Judge.,etc)
are as corrupt as we(commons)
probably are".
This
statement is false. While we commons may be "potentially" as
corruptible as neta, IAS, IPS, judges --- in reality most of us commons are not
even 0.01% corrupt as any one of them. Some 80% Indians make less than Rs 20
per day. And of remaining 20%, some 15% make less than Rs 10000 per month. Its
only top 5% who makes money that would fit "minimum" of IPS, IAS,
judge or Minister.
So
80% Indians are non-corrupt. And 15% are only slightly corrupt. It is only 5%
who give/take huge bribes.
Questioner-the
5% you speak of are; The businessmen, the politicians, the babus;
=>
The ones who frame policies
=>
The ones who run this country
=>
The ones who create jobs/wealth
=>
The ones who are the growth engines of India's 9% GDP.
A
big part of wealth still comes from minerals. And crores of labor also work to
create this 9% growth.
Questioner-If
it werent for those 5%, India would still be begging for alms to foreign
countries. Take for eg. reliance, had they not fuelled their growth with
corruption, would it even have come into existence?
Due
to bribery, we have LESSER industry. West has far less corruption, which is the
reason why they have more industry. And Japan has far less corruption, which is
why they have more industry. Corruption retards progress as it results into
cornering and reduction of opportunities.
(4)
Bribe is an engine oil that fuels the need of a speeding economy.
Boss,
please do gather data from across the countries before building hypothesis. The
economies which produce complex engineering goods, like Sweden, Norway,
Finland, UK, US, Germany, Japan etc are the ones which have low corruption. So
corruption, retards industry, does not fuel it.
Questioner-we
are still a developing country. and so we are DEVELOPING ways to stop
corruption.
Back
in 1800s and early 1900s, when West and Japan were developing the corruption in
police, courts and large number of areas (almost entire govt except foreign
affairs and some weapons contracts) corruption was negligible.
And
while we say India is developing, please do note that our growth is heavily
dependent on imported technology. We are NOT manufacturing real complex stuff.
This is the result of corruption. Corruption retards real manufacturing.
-----
Questioner-When
we are developed, we will have developed stronger anti-corruption laws.
If
corruption goes on, chances are high that we will fall apart completely and
become so weak that some country like US will just take over.
----
Consider
years 1500-1757. Corruption in India was rampant and that in UK was lesser.
Result? Industries increased in UK, it technology grew and later weapons
improved. And by 1757, UK had conquered part of India and by 1857, it had
conquered over half the India.
Questioner-As
it is, it is being increasingly difficult for corruption these days.
The
places where there is discretionary powers, corruption is HIGHER than it was in
1991. eg in courts, IAS and IPS. The only places where corruption went down is
railway tix, some low level GoI transaction etc.
(5)
Why is caste conversion rising ?
The
reality is is : a large number of Hindu UCs want Dalits to stay illiterate and
poor. Who else will clean their floors, wash their cloths, clean their
utensils, clean their gutters and bathe their kids? So they hate to see
missionaries giving cash and English education to dalits and tribals. Hence the
violence.
---
And
folks, Dalits and Tribals have their own mind. The poorest of the poorest
person I have met till date is well aware of society, and is not hapless and
brainless as many postors here try to project. I have met 100s of Dalit
converts, who have read Gita and Bible both, and say that they decided to
convert AFTER reading both. And this is despite the fact that they would lose
CBR benefits after conversion.
---
Conversion
is rising, and answer can be obtained by asking a different question "why
didn't SC/ST convert till now?" Well, answer is CBR (Caste Based
Reservation). CBR was a powerful tool that held Dalit/Tribal middle class, upper
middle class and upper class in Hindu fold. But as privatization increases, CBR
is becoming lame (Because there
is no reservation in private, only in government departments).
So few Dalits and Tribal middle class men find any reason to stay Hindu anymore.
And
every upper class man who converts takes 10 middle class men with and 1000 poor
with him (because of the influence they have in
society). And every middle class man who
converts takes 100 poors with him. For that matter, most missionaries in India
are from dalit middle class or their fathers were dalit middle class, and are
not imported.( http://www.stephen-knapp.com/christian_persecution_in_india.htm)
---
The
biggest factor that is assisting them is -- decision of Indian upper middle
class (mostly Hindu upper castes) to keep Dalits and Tribals poor and
illiterate by denying them land rents over GoI owned plots/mines and denying
them English education. This is what makes Dalits and Tribals go towards
missionaries, who are willing to give them some cash (or benefits in kind, such
as medicine) and English education as well.
Many
Hindutvavadies think that they can win the battle by these goons and by
electing corrupt neta like Modi.
Well,
the goons' strength lies in corrupt judges, corrupt IPS and corrupt MLAs. In
absence of corrupt judges, corrupt IPS and corrupt neta, goon will not even
kick a cat, forget beating missionaries.
Perhaps
this Hindutvavadies have not realized that these corrupt judges, corrupt neta
and corrupt IPS would gladly help same missionaries when missionaries offer
than twice the money, coupled with political pressures that will come from
MNCs. As Hindutvavadies must be aware the top brass of Congress, CPM, BJP, IAS,
IPS, CBI, Supreme Court etc are now on MNC payroll. And Hindutvavavdies should
also grasp the fact that MNCs have assisted Vatican since 1980 in many many
ways all over the world (e.g. in South Korea, a Christian is more likely to get
promotion in MNC than a Buddhist). And MNCs in India will be more than happy to
use their contacts in BJP, Congress, CPM, IAS, IPS, CBI and Supreme Court to
assist Vatican and their missionaries.
So
it is matter of time before this corrupt judges, corrupt IPS, corrupt neta et
al join the missionaries. And when that happens, half the VHP goons will also
join the missionaries and rest half will be prison if not dead.
---
And
then some Hindutvavadies hope that corrupt neta like Modi can save them. Well,
Advani (now Haaji Advani) stooped low to the extent of worshiping Jinnah who
had ordered massacre of lakhs of Hindus and expulsion of crores of Hindus. His
foster son, Modi, will overtake him when Vatican tighten screws on him via
MNCs.
---
It
is pity that all that Hindutvavadies could find to carry their agenda is bunch
of goons and corrupt neta like Modi, and cant find anyone better.
---
The
Upper Caste elitemen of India are openly hostile in providing good education to
commons, and their hostility towards English education is immense. Though
almost all UC elitemen send their kids to English medium schools or at least
local language schools which teach English from grade-1, they insist that us
commons' kids MUST not learn English till std-7. So English of us commons' kids
will be weak for ever. The crooked UC elitemen have this design so that UC
elitekids get ahead and us commons kids simply work as their servants. RSS and
VHP schools DO NOT teach English to commons' kids for this reason only.
The
affinity of English education in us commons is immense. So there comes
missionaries to exploit this demand-supply gap. He says "become Christian
and I will give quality English education to your kids". Now Dalits and
Tribals are anyway fed up with UC elitemen and the atrocities inflicted by UC
IPS, IAS, judges, elitemen etc. Too that, add the prospect of English
education. So they happily convert.
---
The
UC elitemen hate dalits getting English education more than missionaries. If
Dalits and Tribals get English education, they may also defect to US, and then
become much stronger in India after they send dollars earned abroad. This will
drastically reduce the opportunities of their kids in future. Thats why they
hate missionaries.
Aside
: recently Modi, who is an OBC tried to make English compulsory for all kids in
Gujarat starting std-1. Most BD, VHP and BJP workers in Gujarat, who are now
OBCs, supported him. Guess who opposed him most? Not Congress. Not CPM (which
has only a few leaders in Gujarat anyway). It was RSS and senior BJP neta (all
were UCs !!), along with some Gandhivadies (who were also all UC !!).
Questioner- Do
u support anti fraudulent conversion bill?
There
are already existing laws in IPC which ban use of force or lies for ANY
purpose, forget conversion. If force and lies are reason, we do NOT need any
law to begin with.
The
UC elitemen want the above bill to ban use of money and English education as
means to convert. They know that once missionaries are stopped from offering
English education for conversion, missionaries will stop teaching English. This
is what these UC elitemen want --- they dont want commons to learn English.
----
And
, why do you oppose use of cash and English education for conversion?
Hindu
elitemen's desire to keep us commons weak in every way (not teaching us weapon
us, not teaching English, not teaching us law etc) will incur huge cost to
India.
Hindus
donate HUUUUGE monies to temples. Now temple owners are hostile to use that
money for improving us commons' level by teaching us weapon use, English, law
etc. Thats another matter. But Hindus in general are very generous when it
comes to donations.
----
.
Almost all neta are now MNC , Vatican agent. This includes your beloved BJP
neta. Just recently, VHP activists in Dang in Gujarat asked LKA to write letter
to HomeMin and Foreign Affairs Ministry in center to expel a list of
missionaries whose visa had expired and were doing conversion activities which
go against visa conditions. LKA refused !!
LKA
wants MNCs to ask ToI to support him or oppose him as less as possible. So LKA
has become MNC agent and also a de-facto agent of Christianists as
Christianists and MNCs have a tie up.
---
Questioner-As
per this report there is a rise of Hindu population by 2.52%, and that of
Christian population by.008% between the years 1991 to 1998.
Please
do google on term crypto-christian.
The
upper caste ruled congress was compelled to offer reservation …. The
reservation for lower caste for safety of upper caste.(as otherwise the people
would have mass converted and would have
become against the upper castes . Similar thing
happens in Naxal ridden area )
(6)
Democracy runs better in small size countries and states.
Many
confuse small size with democracy. A common argument given is that "See,
vibrant democracy was possible in Athens because it was small in size".
Well, it was because of democracy that such a small sized Athens became so
strong that it could rule over a large area and left an impact that we remember
even today. Athens had only 60000 adult males. To that, add 60000 females and
some 120,000 children. So free population was 240,000. Such tiny population had
over 300,000 slaves in Athens and had dominated territories around Athens which
would be 10-20 times its population and size. Essentially, the democracy they
followed made them so strong that they could enslave so many people and
dominate so many others. So instead of saying that "democracy is possible
only in small region/population", a more accurate statement would be
"democracy makes small population so powerful that it can dominate over
much larger groups".
As
population/size increases , one only needs to change the procedure code so that
larger population can participate. Thats about it. Otherwise size and democracy
had nothing in common or nothing against.
---
In
a "well designed" administrative system, the inefficiency if any will
not be proportional to N, but will be proportional to log(N). And the increase
in size is often accompanied with vast improvement in technology by which
citizens can supervise the officers, provided laws to supervise those officers
exist. The problem today is absence of these laws, not size.
Questioner:
It
is exactly the point about the technological level for the given society which
may be responsible for the inability to ensure "proper"
representation. The larger the size, more difficult the actual physical and
direct participation in decision making, and hence the greater need for
representations and procedures - each of which introduce more and more
opportunities to corrupt the process.
Yes,
greater the need for procedures, but not representation. eg The technology
today enables people to take 100-200 decisions directly every year. But how
many decisions do we take directly as of today? Only 3 in 5 years (electing
Corporator, electing MLA and electing MP). So the lack of direct control is
more due to absence of procedures, not size.
Questioner:
As long as opportunities
are there, those who benefit from such corruption will always utilize them.
Not
if citizens have procedures to punish the decision makers. eg Today we in India
have no procedure to imprison a Supreme Court judge, Minister or even am IAS,
IPS. And thats the reason why they openly collect bribe. Once procedures to imprison
them, confiscate their ill gotten wealth etc come in the hands of commons,
these people will learn to behave. Once again, the reason is lack of procedure,
not size.
(7)
Why do educated and concerned citizens fail to create a better alternatives? Why
are we stuck with ABV, Pramod, Yechuri, Aruns, Narendrabhai, Karat, MMS,
Rajmata, PC etc?
The
educated ones fail to create better alternatives in Kerala,UP as well as rest
of India as
1)
Many concerned citizens believe in moral value and national character nonsense.
The nonsense they believe is "improve the moral values and nation will
improve". So they focus on moral education and character building
nonsense. So they dont take interest in administration, courts etc where
problems exists. So their participation in politics is zero, or confined to
merely replacing one neta by another. They cant think beyond personality
worshipping be Modi or Basu or Buddha or ABV or LKA or RagivG etc. So they do
not spend time in thinking on what changes in administration, courts etc they
should lobby for. So neta change, administration, courts etc remains same, and
mess goes on.
2)
Our textbook writing college professors, in order to please their elitemen
sponsors, have filled textbooks with anti-common garbage. Only rants I read is
"common Indians are castist; common Indians are communal; common Indian
are emotional, crooks etc etc". And they hide the fact that ALL these
vices are present in Indian
Nbjprie(Neta-babu-judge-police-regulator-intellectual-elite) as well, plus
Nbjprie have 2 more vices not in commons : nepotism and nexuses with criminals
and other Nbjprie. So students in India, including concerned citizens, have
become anti-democracy. So they advocate pro-oligarchy solutions only and oppose
democratic solutions like right to replace/punish the corrupt, preferential
voting, increasing election deposits,simplifying electoral form filling, etc.
which will promote better candidates for the voters.
(8)
Things have certainly become better in India, but also the same way in the
West. The US has had democracy, elections, trial by jury for 200+ years, but
women got the vote only about 10-15 years before they did so in India. (BTW,
the British absolutely did not introduce universal suffrage to India).
Situation
of women in US/UK was better than in India even before women got right to vote.
For that matter Swiss gave right to vote to women much after India did.
Nevetheless women's situation was far better.
British
introduced election-procedure in 1934 and it was WITHOUT universal suffarge.
One reason was that it was FIRST attempt and another was that a large section
of India elite, including educated ones like lawyers, and many Congress members
were also opposed to universal suffrage. As for Indian elites, most Indian princeley
states did NOT introduce election-procedure even after invaders=Brits did. In
1936, people in Rajkot which was ruled by INDIAN King and NOT directly by
Brits, held a demonstration with demand of conducting election. How did the
king respond? He violently crushed them.
So lets give credit to Brits for at least introdusing elections rather than
cursing them for not giving Universal Suffrage.
Also,
US's founding fathers and founding elite NEVER decreased democraticness from
what Brits had left. Whereas India's founding fathers/elite DECREASED
democraticness from where Brits had left by abolishing Jury System. I hope the
fact Indian neta/babu/jufges/intellectuals/elite etc abolished Jury System in
India late 1950s and in early 1970s will FULLY convince everyone and anyone
that India's Nbjprie(neta-babu-judge-buddhijivi-intellectuals-elite) are
OPPOSED to democratic-form of government. No further proof is required.
(9)
Basic education (12th) should be a requirement to be elected to legislature.
AND, a 3 month basic law course (in the local language or english) should be
attended and _passed_ by the lawmakers who have no legal experience.
Over
75% (guess) MPs are graduate. Many are LLBs. And even an illterate person in
India (or anywhere in world) knows basic laws like IPC etc. Educated MPs are as
corrupt as illterate. So education etc will NOT improve their law-making
abilities.
Also,
MPs' job is to
1)present
draft to Speaker
2)say
YES/NO when Speaker schedules voting on that draft
MP
is supposed to do (1) and (2) as per the wish/will of citizens. It is citizens'
job to prepare the draft and submit it to MP. As long as citizens have NOT
given any draft, MPs is not even required to move a muscle.
(10)
"The system is fine, its the people that is the problem."
WRONG.
The Nbjprie are corrupt only because they know that we commons cannot
imprison/fine them no matter how much they rob us commons. So we need to solve
the problem at both levels - people and system. We need to expel some bad eggs
as well as enact laws (like recall, Jury etc) that will increase corrupt people
landing in the prison.
(11)
Yes the promotion and selection process in the military are very systematic and
centralised .The reason being every one knows that he/she is being watched by their
superiors and are well aware of the fact there is no second chance in case
caught of any malpractice.
The
military is less corrupt as lower and mid ranking officers dont interact with
public nor they have any power over civilians nor are their budgets too high.
(12)
Fight against corruption has to start from below
Nonsense.
Fight
against corruption MUST start from top. This litany that focus on bottom only
is only to create a heaven for people on top. "Focus on corruption at
bottom" means fight against Talati. Tahsildaar etc and let IAS, IPS,
Ministers, Supreme Court judges, HCjs etc mint as much as they want peacefully.
IMO,
we should attack the top first. Clean all the Supreme Courts benches first and
Central Ministers. Next, clean High Court benches and State Ministers. When
that happens, 99% of the corruption at bottom will disappear. And then we take
care of the next 1%. But if Supreme Court judges and Central Ministers are all
corrupt, then corruption at bottom will never end no matter how much we fight.
-----
The
bottom survives because of the top. Its the knowledge that the babu is corrupt
which makes it easier for the peon to ask for bribe
And
forget knowledge, sometimes the top asks bottom to collect money and pass it
up. And to indulges into reckless nepotism while recruiting bottom and middle
which gives everyone a reason to be corrupt.
Eg
why should a lower court judge give up his temptations when he knows that SC-Cj
Khare bailed out a convicted wealthy Swiss pedophile? And why should PSI not
collect bribes when HomeMin is giving target to each PI , and threatening a
transfer is target is not met !!
All
this hoopla that we must fight at bottom only and spare the top only ensures
that IAS, judges and Ministers and top can collect bribes and also sleep
peacefully while we all are busy fighting against Talaties and Tahsildaars.
Questioner-You
have always suggested "systemic solutions" for corruption. Nothing
wrong with that - but systemic soclutions with procedures like jurysys etc represent
a "top-down" approach which is only one of the two methods that
should be used.
My
approach is 100% bottom up and I have no faith in pure top-down approach. My
approach is to FIRST force PM to sign `Transparent Complaint/Proposal
procedure` Executive Notification which would enable citizens to register
YES/NO on proposals(previously submitted at collector office by any citizen)
for Rs 3 fee at villge officer/Talati's office, and all this will come on the
PM website, so that lakhs-crores can see those and verify those , anytime,
anywhere. And ALL laws I have proposed
including JurySys will go via `Transparent Complaint/Proposal procedure`
channel. So nothing is top down. Later, the bottom will have procedures to
expel PM, CMs, SCjs etc and so the "top will be down" literally.
(13)
What kind of values we need to reduce corruption?
Consider
some valuable question
1.
Who owns the Natural Resources and GoI plots? Who should get the rents from
them
2.
Are commons Supreme or SCjs?
3.
Should citizens be allowed to expel SC-Cj?
And
many more, IOW, values and political system are one and the same. There is
total mess in India, because commons do not have democratic values such as
citizens own GoI plots, citizens are supreme and Citizens should have procedures
to expel SC-Cj. Whereas
Nbjprie(Neta-babu-judge-police-regulator-intellectual-elite) have oligarchic
values such which says that SCjs are supreme and citizens are subject, citizens
should get zero rent from GoI plots and so forth.
(14)
These proposed procedures are revolutionary and impractical.
None
of the proposals are revolutionary and each one is a TINY small change in
existing administration. eg Consider the first proposal-`Transparent
Complaint/Proposal procedure`- (http://www.righttorecall.info/001.pdf)
The
first proposal says -- put letters of us commons on PM's website and put us
commons' YES/NO on PM's website. i.e. We commons get freedom to write on PM's
website. Does this sound like a revolution to you? Of course, people who oppose
my small evolutionary changes often WRONGLY label then as revolutionary to
create a negative opinion by throwing bad labels on it.
----
And
if one wants a proper discussion, one should avoid ambiguous words particularly
words like "practical", "impractical" etc. The word
"impractical" has at following different and unrelated meaning --
1.
logistically infeasible
2.
Nbjprie(Neta-babu-judge-police-regulator-intellectual-elite) will vehemently
disagree and so I am scared of supporting it
3.
my friends and relatives will not like if I support this law
4.
commons will not understand what the proposed law is
and
many more meanings.
eg
my CA and lawyer friends say that "idea of not bribing Income Tax babu or
judges is impractical". They mean (2) . The same CAs and lawyers also say
that "opposing interviews in judicial recruitments is impractical".
Again, they mean (2) -- they are scared of consequences they will have to face
if they demand abolition of interviews in judiciary. And when one says
"lets move to Mars to escape from corrupt neta-babu-judges", I say it
is an impractical idea and I mean (1).
So
when you use the word "impractical", how do I know what you mean?
Suffices to say, that such words with 5-10 meanings should be avoided.
*pls
do mentioned judges and intellectuals along with neta-babu. It is necessary we
kill the myth that judges and intellectuals are non-corrupt, and so it is
necessary that we take their names every time names of neta-babu is taken.
The
first EN is small, tiny evolution. So simple and tiny that many such as
yourself cant even notice the potential. But any seasoned politician,
intellectual can see the tide it will unleash and how much damage it will cause
to corrupt neta, IAS, IPS, judges. Which is why they have hated this first EN.
(15)
There are unscrupulous fellows who sell land to multiple people and disappear.
What is the solution?
This
is due to lack of Torrens System in India. The problem was there all over
world, and was first solved by Robert Torrens in Australia in 1860 by designing
a record keeping system which was later called as Torrens System, and solved
the problem of frauds in land deals.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Torrens_title
The
Indian neta-IAS-judges are hostile to Torrens system as the system requires
registration of every "pre-sale" deed known as banakhat and sale
deed. You know, neta-IAS-IPS-judges have miles and miles of land under their
name, and a registration all this deed would make their wealth holding public
(16) Why good guys do not come in politics ?
Voters are NOT fool.
Just becaue they dont vote as you want them to vote
doesn’t make them fools.
---
Since judges are nepotic and corrupt, violent and
financial criminals rule the roost. And so violent and financial criminals have
ensured that no 'good guys' dont become powerful and well known enough to even become an MLA. So
only criminals or supporters of criminals are able to become well known. Some
people support violent criminals, while some like Pramod, MMS etc support
financial criminals (like Harshad Mehta).
If we want good guys to win, we first must ensure that
good guys can breath and live, And for that we need to imprison violent and
financial criminals, we need to imprison corrupt policemen, judges, Ministers
etc. Only after that good guys will be able to win election.
The countries which installed JurySys were able to get
low corruption regimes with higher freedom. (Communist countries had low
corruption for a while, but no freedom either). The combination of high freedom
and at the same time low indiscipline and low corruption created huge growth
and reduced poverty. So it is NOT poverty which leads to corruption, but other
way round.
(17) I think there are a variety of factors that
influence corruption. Poverty being the biggest one of them.
Poverty is least of the reason behind corruption. Are IPS
poor? Are SCjs poor? And all organized and planned crimes begin from courts ---
the organized and planned criminal will NOT commit crimes if he knows that
judges (or Jurors) will punish him with higher probabilities. Spare handful of
crimes which are due to emotional outbursts, planned crimes are always a result
of pro-criminal approach of courts, policemen etc.
eg Dawood has deep nexuses with SCjs, neta, IPS etc. So
deep, that he could even bribe SCjs to harass Modi and Vanjhara for killing his
agent Sorab. It is nexuses like this which makes Dawood and his men fearless
criminals. They know that police, judges etc will acquit them no matter what
they do.
Questioner-Also, policeman in India are badly paid, so
once again they are more inclined to take bribes.
Only constables are low paid. PSI and above, like IPS,
are very very well paid. Yet they are all corrupt.