6.1 How 3 line law-draft reduces corruption in PM,
judges, Police Chief etc. in 4 months?
6.2 Description
of Right to Recall PM draft
6.3 A
numerical example for the proposed procedures to replace PM, CMs
6.4 Description
of Right to Recall CM draft
6.5 Will PM,
CMs get replaced every week? NO
6.8 What if
PM, MPs do not obey citizens?
6.9 Please
note the last two clauses of the RTR-PM law-draft I have proposed
6.10 Draft of
Right to Recall CM
6.11 What if CM,
MLAs do not obey citizens?
6.12 Draft of
Right to recall City Mayor
6.13 To those who
oppose RTR over PM, CM, Mayor
6.15 How these
replacement procedures reduce corruption?
6.17 RTR and
Atharvaved, Satyarth Prakash
6.18 West has no
RTR-PM, RTR-SCj. So why do we need it?
6.19 Countering
anti-recall arguments
6.20 Can RTR in
district, where majority is Bangladeshi increase harassment on Hindus?
6.21 Stand of
other politicians and activist-leaders on RTR-PM
6.22 How can YOU
help in bringing RTR-PM draft in India’s Gazette?
6.23 Why I
propose first mass-movement on TCP-draft, and
not on RTR-PM-draft?
The
day Ahimsamurti Mahatma Udham
Singh manages to convince PM to print TCP-draft in the Gazette Notification, I
will submit drafts for Right to Recall PM via SMS, Right to Recall CM via SMS,
Right to Recall Supreme Court judges via SMS, RTR HCjs,
RTR RBI Governor, RTR District Police Chief etc.. as affidavits. If citizens
hate this RTR proposals, I have nothing to offer. But it may happen that crores
of citizens may register YES via SMS or other means on these affidavits because
of their anger against corrupt PM, CMs, judges, Police Chiefs etc. and personal
interests. And then PM, CMs may print these RTR via SMS law-drafts in Gazette.
Thus by sending orders to PM via SMS and using three line law-draft, we commons
of India can bring Right to Recall via SMS laws in India. And Right to Recall
via SMS will create a threat that will force these officers etc. reduce their
bribe intake in mere one month. So if RTR-activists focus on TCP and sending
orders to PM via SMS, then corruption in PM, CMs etc. can be brought down
within months, without waiting for elections.
If
activists insist on waiting till they get majority in Parliament and then
enacting RTR laws, then there is possibility that RTR-activists will be waiting
for ever. First they may never get majority in Parliament. And worse, even if
they get majority, there is possibility that their own MPs will sell out and
refuse to pass RTR laws. Eg in 1977, Janata Party MPs
had promised to pass RTR laws during election campaign, and after getting
elected, later they refused to pass RTR laws. So IMO, RTR-activists should
focus on creating mass movement on TCP rather than elections.
So
please note – my proposal is NOT that we will come in power and will
print Right to Recall PM or RTR-CM draft in the Gazette. And we do not insist
that citizens should unleash mass-movement to force PM to print RTR PM-draft in
the Gazette or CM to print RTR CM law-draft in the Gazette. My proposal
is --- we, citizens of India, should ask PM/CM to gather public opinion using
TCP on whether RTR-PM-draft and RTR-CM draft should be printed in Gazette or
not. The public opinion obtained will enable PM and CMs to decide whether
RTR-PM-draft and RTR-CM-draft should be printed or not. To gather public
opinion in less subjective way, my proposal is that citizens should start Udham Singh centric mass-movement to ask PM to print
TCP-draft in the Gazette.
The
third GN we demand is to create procedure using which we commons can replace PM
without waiting for 5 long years. Following are the main points of the proposed
draft:
1. Any citizen who
wishes to become PM can inward his name before Collector
2. Any citizen of India
can walk to Talati's office, pay Rs
3 fee, approve at most five persons for PM’s position. The Talati
will give him receipt with his voter-id, date/time, the persons he approved
etc..
3. The Talati will put citizen's preferences on Govt website with his voter-ID.
4. A citizen can change
his approvals any day for Rs 3 fee
5. On every 1st of the
month, the Secretary will publish the approval counts of each candidate
6. The Approval count of
the PM will higher of the following two
o
number
of citizens who have approved him
o
sum
of votes obtained by the MPs who have supported the PM
7. If any person has
over 15 crore approvals and 1 crore more approvals than existing PM, then
existing PM may resign and MPs may
appoint person with highest approvals as PM.
To
give an example, the PM of 2009 had support of about 300 MPs whose votes add up
to about 18 crores. So as per the procedure I have proposed, if and when over 19
crores citizens approve another person, the next person will become new PM.
RTR-CM-draft
creates a procedure using which we commons can
replace CM without waiting for 5 years
1. Any citizen who
wishes to become CM can inward his name before Collector.
2. Any citizen of India
can walk to Talati's (Patwari)
office, pay Rs 3 fee, approve at most five persons
for the CM position. The Talati will give him receipt
with his voter-id, date/time, persons he approved etc..
3. The Talati will put citizen's preferences on Govt website with his voter-ID.
4. A citizen can change
his approvals any day for Rs 3 fee
5. On every 1st of the
month, the Secretary will publish approval counts of candidates
6. The approval count of
the existing CM will be counted as higher of the following two
o
number
of citizens who have approved him
o
sum
of votes obtained by the MLAs who have supported the CM
7. If any person has 5%
(of all) more approvals than existing CM, then the existing CM shall resign and
person with highest Approvals shall become CM. Pls
note that that 5% is “5% of all registered voters”, not just those who voted or
files approvals.
In
most companies, employers have power to fire employees and that does not mean
that employers fire employees every day. Worse, most employers look for stable
employees and resort to expulsion only when they make some terrible deliberate
damage. The citizens will use this procedure not to expel a CM they dislike and
not even to expel a CM who had made mistakes. They will use it only when they
think that CM, PM is outrightly corrupt and
anti-citizen. It takes intense hatred to think of expulsion and such hatred
will come only from blatant back-stabbing, not some minor errors.
US
has procedure of expulsion for Governors in about 20 states. Those states must
have seen about 20*100/4 = about 500 Governors in past 100 years. How many
faced recall? Only 2. So the mechanism has not created any instability. But has
acted as a latent threat on all Governors of US which is one important reasons
why they have been less corrupt than CMs of India.
|
# |
Procedure For |
Procedure / instruction |
|
1 |
- |
The word citizen
would mean a registered voter The word may means may
or need not, and clearly means “no binding”. |
|
2 |
Collector
|
If a citizen of
India above 30 years wishes to be PM, he can appear before Collector.
Collector would issue a serial number for a filing fee same as deposit amount
for MP election and put his name on the PM’s website. |
|
3 |
Talati , (or
Talati’s Clerks) |
(3.1) If a citizen comes in person to Talati’s office, pays Rs 3 fee
, and approves at most five persons for the PM position, the Talati would enter his approvals in the computer and
would him a receipt with his voter-id#, date/time and the persons he
approved. The fee shall be Rs 1 for those with BPL
card. (3.2) If a the citizen comes to cancel his
Approvals, the Talati will cancel one of more of
his approvals without any fee. (3.3) The Collector may create a system of sending
SMS feedback to the voter (3.4) The Collector may create a system of taking
finger-print and picture of the voter and putting it on the receipt. (3.5) PM may add means to enable citizens to register
approvals via SMS. PM may create a system where by citizens can register
approvals via ATM |
|
4 |
Talati |
The Talati will put the preferences of the citizen on
district’s website with citizen’s voter-ID number and his preferences. |
|
5 |
Collector |
On every Monday,
the Collectors will publish Approval counts for each candidate. |
|
6 |
PM |
The first PM may count his approval count
as higher of the following two o number of citizens
who have approved him o sum of votes
obtained by Loksabha MPs who have supported him |
|
7 |
PM |
If a candidate gets
approvals 1 crore more than approvals existing PM has, then PM may resign and may ask MPs to appoint approved person as new PM. |
|
8 |
LS
MPs |
The MPs may elect the person stated in
clause-7 as new PM. |
|
9 |
District
Collector |
If any citizen
wants a change in this law-draft, he may submit an affidavit at DC’s office
and DC or his clerk will post affidavit on PM’s website for Rs 20/- per page. |
|
10 |
Talati (or Patwari) |
If any citizen want
to register his opposition to this law or any section or wants to register
YES-NO to affidavit submitted in above clause, Talati
will enter YES/NO and give him a receipt for Rs 3
fee. The YES-NO will be posted on PM’s website. |
Say 75 crore citizens
desire to file approval for PM. Then cost they have to pay Rs
3 per approval, and so total cost is about Rs 225 cr.
And procedure can be implemented via ATM and SMS. Then cost will reduce to few paise per approval. So cost of replacing PM via SMS will
Rs 5 crores
or even less.
One may ask – what if
PM and MPs do not follow the clause-7, clause-8 of the above proposed GN? Well,
if a huge % all voters have approved a person via explicit registration, it
would be end of PM’s and MPs’ political (and real) lives if they refuse to
appoint the approved person as PM. We would like to confine discussions within
politically realistic scenarios, and MPs overruling explicit proven written
political demand of over such huge % of voters is an unrealistic situation.
Please note the last
two clauses of the draft proposed above. These two clauses are nothing but TCP.
Well, every draft of mine has these two lines. Why this repetition? Because I
want to repeat, re-repeat and re-re-repeat 1000s of times that we the commons
of India have right to register difference on GoI
books and so we must have procedure to register differences. The symbolism
apart, the repetition has political value. It may happen that an RTR activist
has to confront a person who is opposed proposed RTR law-draft. Then
RTR-activist can challenge him to provide the drafts of the laws they want, and
then ask them to add the same two last lines. If the adversary opposes the last
two lines’ additions, then he can be accused of being anti-common. And if he
accepts these two line addition, then effectively his law-draft implements TCP,
using which all laws I have proposed can be implemented using citizens’ YESes.
The two line addition
shows that “demand for TCP” is not just clone positive concept but TCP is a
law-draft that can be added to any democratic law-draft without decreasing its
effect. And the two line addition is sufficient to thwart any undemocratic
law-draft. Because if an undemocratic law-draft has these two lines, it will
get rejected in few days or weeks.
The last two lines
also shows the fact that so called TCP is what I call as “Perfect Antidote” to
all poisons. What is “Perfect Antidote”? A Perfect Antidote is something that
if added to a glass of liquid, it will do no harm and will destroy any and all
poisons in that glass. These two clauses of TCP are something that can gel well
with every law-draft. And they have capacity that if the law-draft is good,
they would do no harm and if the law-draft is bad, the two clauses will ensure
that citizens can remove that law-draft. Thus, these two clauses of TCP is what
I call as “Perfect Antidote”.
|
# |
For |
Procedure / instruction |
|
1 |
- |
The
word citizen would mean a registered voter The
word may means may or need not, and clearly means “no binding”. |
|
2 |
Collector |
If any citizen of
India above 30 years of age wishes to become CM, he can appear before Cabinet
Secretary. Collector would issue him a serial number after taking filing fee
same as deposit amount for MP election. Collector will put his name on CM’s
website. |
|
3 |
Talati , (or
Talati’s Clerks) |
If a citizen of
that district comes in person to Talati’s office,
pays Rs 3 fee , and approves at most five persons
for the CM position, the Talati would enter his
approvals in the computer and would him a receipt with his voter-id#,
date/time and the persons he approved. If a the citizen comes to cancel his
Approvals, the Talati will cancel one of more of
his approvals without any fee. |
|
4 |
Talati |
The Talati will put the preferences of the citizen on
district’s website with citizen’s voter-ID number and his preferences. |
|
5 |
Collectors |
On every Monday, the
Collectors will publish approval counts for each candidate. |
|
6 |
CM |
The first CM may count his approval count as
higher of the following two ·
number of citizens who have approved him ·
sum of votes obtained by the MLAs who have supported
him |
|
7 |
CM |
If a candidate gets
approval 2% (of ALL registered voters) above the approval count the existing
CM has, then existing CM may
resign and may request MLAs to
appoint the person approved by the citizens as new CM. |
|
8 |
MLAs |
The MLAs may elect the person stated in clause-7
as new CM. |
|
9 |
District
Collector |
If any citizen
wants a change in this law-draft, he may submit an affidavit at DC’s office
and DC or his clerk will post the affidavit on the website of Chief Minister
for a fee of Rs 20/- per page. |
|
10 |
Talati (or Patwari) |
If any citizens
want to register his opposition to this law or any section or wants to
register YES-NO to any affidavit submitted in above clause, and he comes to Talati’s office with voter-ID and pays Rs 3 fee, Talati will enter
YES/NO and give him a receipt. The YES-NO will be posted on the website of
the Chief Minister. |
|
11 |
PM |
With approval of 38
crore citizen-voters in India, PM may suspend this law-draft in the state for
5 years. |
One may ask – what if
CM, MLAs do not follow the clause-7, clause-8 of the above proposed Gazette
Notifications? Well, if a huge % all voters have approved a person via explicit
registration, it would be end of MLAs’ and CM’s political (and real) lives if
they refuse to appoint the approved person as CM. I would like to confine
discussions within politically realistic scenarios, and MLAs overruling
explicit proven written political demand of over such huge % of voters is an
unrealistic situation.
|
# |
Procedure For |
Procedure / instruction |
|
1 |
- |
The
word citizen would mean a registered voter The
word may means may or need not, and clearly means “no binding”. |
|
2 |
MC
aka Municipal Commissioner |
If any citizen of India
above 30 years of age wishes to become Mayor, he can appear before Municipal
Commissioner. MC would issue him a serial number after taking filing fee same
as deposit amount for MP election. |
|
3 |
Civic
Center Clerk |
If a citizen of
that district comes in person to Civic Center, pays Rs
3 fee , and approves at most five persons for the Mayor position, the Civic
Center clerk would enter his approvals in the computer and would him a
receipt with his voter-id#, date/time and the persons he approved. If a the citizen
comes to cancel his Approvals, the Clerk will cancel one of more of his
approvals without any fee. |
|
4 |
Civic
Center Clerk |
The Clerk will put
the preferences of the citizen on City’s website with citizen’s voter-ID
number and his preferences. |
|
5 |
MC |
On every Monday, MC
may publish Approval counts for each candidate. |
|
6 |
Mayor |
The first
Mayor may count his approval count as higher of following two ·
number of citizens who have approved him ·
sum of votes obtained by the Corporators
who have supported him |
|
7 |
Mayor |
If a candidate gets
approval 2% (of ALL registered voters) above approval count the existing
mayor has, then existing Mayor may
resign and may request Corpotarators to appoint person approved by citizens as
Mayor. |
|
8 |
Corpotarators |
The Corpotarators may
elect the person stated in clause-7 as new Mayor |
|
9 |
District
Collector |
If any citizen
wants a change in this law-draft, he may submit an affidavit at DC’s office
and DC or his clerk will post the affidavit on the website of Chief Minister
for a fee of Rs 20/- per page. |
|
10 |
Talati (or Patwari) |
If any citizens
want to register his opposition to this law-draft or any section or wants to
register YES-NO to any affidavit submitted in above clause, and he comes to Talati’s office with voter-ID and pays Rs 3 fee, Talati will enter
YES/NO and give him a receipt. The YES-NO will be posted on the website of
the Chief Minister. |
We request them to
send us draft of the procedures by which citizens can replace PM, CMs if they
think their drafts are better than mine. If that is the case, I shall cancel
our drafts and accept theirs. And if one
believes that we commons should have no procedures to replace PM, CM
etc. we request him not to register YES when I file PM-RP, CM-RP and Mayor-RP
affidavits after TCP is signed. Finally, decision is to be taken by YESes of citizens, not by me.
The
Right to Recall PM, CM, judges etc. gives enormous power to citizens over CMs
and PM. Till now, we have CMs , PM with mass base but no mass pressure. The
procedure to replace CMs, PM creates a mass pressure on the CMs, PM. As of now
most CMs, PM know that they cant be expelled for 5
years and take the citizens for ride. But with this procedure, he may or may
not get replaced, but the threat of replacement will ensure that behaves better
than CMs, PM of today. To enact this procedures, the citizens need not us MRCM
party candidates as MPs and MLAs. they can force existing PM and CMs to enact
the first two MRCM Demands. Then using
the second Govt Order, we intend to enact the Fifth Govt Order.
We
at MRCM-Recall party has proposed similar procedure by which citizens will be
able to replace following officials
The
list is as on 03-jan-2013. The list only increases, does not decrease.
One
question I often face is --- existing officers are corrupt and so the new replacements
will be also equally corrupt. So how will replacements reduce corruption,
nepotism etc.? I shall enumerate the process using examples of District
Education Officer given in section-30.2.
Consider
the position of District Education Officer in-charge of schools in District. I
have proposed Right to Recall DEO draft in section-30.2 which when printed in
Gazette will enable the parents of district to replace DEO. How would RTR-DEO
improve DEO?
There
are about 700 DEOs in India. All 700 are intelligent, capable and efficient.
And out of them about say about 10-15 are not interested in corruption at all
and want to improve education. That asset is what we already have. Now my
RTR-DEO procedure has one more clause --- that if an officer is appointed as
DEO by CM, he can be DEO of only one district ; but if citizens have made him
DEO, he can be DEO of up to 5 districts in State and up to 10 districts in
India. And he would get salaries of all those districts i.e. if a person is DEO
of 4 districts and has been appointed by citizens, then his salary will be 4
times. Further, a person will be entitled to hold 20 positions across
departments i.e. he may be DEO of 5 districts and also become District Health
Officer of 5 districts. In addition, there is provision for vertical rise i.e.
if he serves as District Prosecutors of several Districts, his chances of
becoming State Prosecutors of one and more States increases.
So
out of existing 700 DEOs, say 5-15 are non-corrupt. Once RTR-DEO comes, they
will see an opportunity to do well as well as expand horizontally as well as
vertically. They will start introducing positive changes in the schools in
their districts. They will stop middle officers from taking bribes, they will
ensure that contractors are putting furniture like blackboard, chairs etc. in
schools. They will ensure that teachers do attend schools etc.. And when they
do so, they will no longer give hafta to CMs. Now lets say in all cases CMs transfer them. Then out of 7-15
such cases, in at least 2-5 cases, the parents in order to save their kids’
education will bring that officer back using RTR-DEO.
So
that would improve education in 2-5 districts out of 700 districts of India.
What about the rest? Well, say you are living in district-A. Now say that DEO
of A is corrupt and inefficient. Say there are 5 near by
districts B, C D, E and X. Say district
X alone has good DEO. Then citizens of district-A now have a choice – they can
expel DEO of their district and give double charge of DEO of X. This very choice
and power, that “citizens can now expel me using RTR and bring DEO of X in my place” will create a threat in the
minds of DEO of A, B, C, D and E. So either they will all improve within 2-3
months, or citizens will expel them using RTR and replace him with DEO of X.
And within 8-10 months, all 700 DEOs will improve or face expulsion.
And
within 10-20 months, the officers with “get rich quick” and “hell with
citizens” mentality from will start leaving administration, and will no longer
join administration. So those who want to serve will have now more room and
less corrupt people who will interfere..
The
existing Govt procedures have a flaw that salary etc.
of an honest person does not double if he does twice the work, a phenomenon
common in business. This de-motivates honest people from joining Govt. The RTR
procedures I have proposed enable officers to hold multiple chairs and gain
more salaries. This will increase the inflow of honest as well as enterprising
persons into Govt.
I
have proposed RTR over not just District Education Officers, but also over
District Health Officer, District Police Chief, District Supply Officer (in
charge of rationing) etc.. I have proposed RTR over some 30-50 District level
positions including district judges. So there are about 700 districts and so
RTR will apply on about 30000 officers, judges. The day RTR comes, some 15000
will improve within 24 hours. And when mere 2-5 officers get expelled in India
in district in first month, the remaining 15000 across India will also improve.
IOW, RTR will not require citizens to expel even 10 out of 30000 officers.
Expulsion of just 2-3 officers will serve as enough warning for the rest. So
RTR will not create any instability at all.
Same
way, I have proposed RTR State Govt level positions
and Central Govt positions such as CM, PM, Ministers,
HCjs, SCjs etc.. In some
cases, they will continue. In some cases they will get expelled and replaced by
better persons in their level or lower levels.
Many accuse me of
being pro-American and also accuse me of copying American system blindly. Well,
first I am not pro-America at all – I am highly anti-America and I believe that
US is the biggest enemy of India. US elitemen not
only want to grab all the minerals of India but
also want destroy science/maths education and
impose Christianity using force and “10% genocide” if the need be. So I am not
pro-America at all. But IMO we must understand factors that gave such strength
to US, and RTR is one of the core strength-givers. RTR has created a
low-corruption administration in US, which has made US so strong a country with
so strong Military that it can not only take over oil
wells of other countries, but can also force them to convert to Christianity.
E.g. Iraq. So when I talk about RTR in US, I am only using US as example. I am
not pro-American at all.
RTR
is not from US. RTR is plain common sense. Say you have servants at home such
as cook or person to clean utensils or sweep floors or take care of elderly
parents etc.. Do you have power to expel them? Say Govt
makes a rule that you can pick any servant, but you can expel him only after a
court order not otherwise. And money will get deducted from your account and
will get deposited into his account for next five years. And only he can work
in your home, no other servant will come for next 5 years. Then what will be
your situation wrt to the servant? He will become
your master and you will become his servant. Same is the situation of citizens.
Every Govt employee from SC-Cj
to peon in local office is “public servant”. But since citizens don’t have
procedures to expel them, they have become “public masters”. Just as
shareholders have procedures to expel CEO, Directors, senior managers etc. –
RTR over PM, CMs, SCjs, HCjs
etc. is same common sense. I often feel stupid that I understood RTR only after
studying US and Indian administration in depth and found only trivial factor
such as RTR which is what I should have thought of on the day one. “How stupid
of me, that I didn’t think of it before” – is the only feeling I get when I
look back.
Right
to Recall is also mentioned in Atharvaved. Atharvaved says that Sabha , assembly of all citizens, can
expel the King. Maharshi Dayanand
Saraswatijee in chap-6 of Satyarth
Prakash explain the Raj-Dharm, and in the first 5
sholkas, Maharshi says –
Raja must be “Prajaa-aadhin” i.e. dependent on
commons. And in the next shloka, Maharshi says that
if Raja is not Prajaa-aadhin, then such a Raja would
enter into the nation, rob the citizens and just as a carnivorous animal eats
away the other animals, such Raja who is not Prajaa-aadhin
would eat and destroy the nation. And Maharshi Saraswatijee has taken both shlokas from Atharvved. And please note – word Raja here includes all
Raj-Karmachari i.e. employees of Govt
from Supreme Court Chief judge to Patwari. All
employees of Govt must be Prajaa-aadhin,
or they will rob the citizens – so say the sages who wrote Atharvaved,
and Maharshi Dayanand Saraswatijee agrees with those sages, and I also agree with
those sages. How can we commons make Raja and all Raj-Karmachari
“Prajaa-Aadhin”? Well, RTR PM, RTR Supreme Court
judges, RTR CM are some ways I suggest. And please note – Dayanand
Saraswatijee does speak about BandharaNa-aadheen
Raja, he talks about Prajaa-aadheen Raja. So
answering the question “why policemen in US are less corrupt than in India”, in
the words of Atharvaved and Maharshi
Saraswatijee, the reason is that the Police Chief in
US is Prajaa-Aadheen while in the one in India is not
Prajaa-aadheen at all. And Atharvaved
and Maharshi Saraswatijee
say that if the Raja (or Raj Karmachari such as
Police Chief) is not Prajaa-aadheen, he will rob the
citizens. We see that all the time. And not just District Police Chief, in US,
Governor, MLA, District judge, District Education Officer, District Public
Prosecutor, and in some states, even High Court Chief judge is Prajaa-aadheen. And so these Govt
employee’s robbery is negligible.
In
India, the eminent intellectuals with 4 digit IQ have insisted opposite of what
Atharvaved and Satyarth
Prakash say. The eminent intellectuals with 4 digit IQ say that Raja and Raj-Karmachari i.e. Govt employees
should not be Prajaa-aadheen but should be only
be BandharaNa-aadheen i.e. dependent on Constitution
only. This whole concept of BandharaNa-Aadheen Raja i.e. BandharaNa-aadheen
Ministers, officers, policemen and judges is bogus as BandharaNa’s
interpretation can be twisted by judges, Ministers etc. like a piece of wax.
I
have been campaigning for the recall procedures by which we commons can expel
PM, CMs and judges. All eminent intellectuals have opposed this demand and
tried tooth and nail to show that Gazette Notifications I have proposed are
unconstitutional. Having miserably failed, they say “West does not have this
procedures and so why should India we have such procedures?”
Well,
citizens in US do have procedures by which citizens can expel District level
authorities. And the citizens in US also have procedures to expel Governor in
about 20 states. In the remaining 30 states, the Governors know that if they
misbehave, then citizens are capable of creating a procedure to expel them and
then use that procedure to expel him. So while 20 Governors in US have explicit
threat of expulsion by commons, the
remaining 30 face the same threat implicitly.
Nevertheless,
a question remains : the citizens of US dont have
procedure to expel President and Senators at National level. Yet, in 1929 when
millions or Americans lost jobs, the Senators, President and American elitemen enacted many laws such as 70% income tax, 70%
inheritance tax and used these laws to collect funds necessary to implement
welfare and employment schemes. How could
such pro-common actions happened from US Federal Govt even though there is no recall at Federal
level? Because
in 1929, over 70% of Americans has guns. The welfare state in US and
Europe came in 1930s via an “armed peaceful revolution”. This may sound
contradictory, but it is not. In Russia only 10% to 15% population had weapons
and so Czar could think of suppressing them; he tried and so there was an armed
revolution. But in US and UK over 70% of adults had weapons. And the elitemen could see that suppression was not option even if
all policemen and soldiers are deployed. And example
of Russian Revolution of 1917 was before them and was too fresh in their
memories. So the American elitemen in 1932-1936
agreed to give 40% to 70% of their income as income tax and agreed to give 40%
to 70% of their wealth as inheritance tax upon death to implement welfare and
employment schemes. This was no goodwill, but
a way to save remaining 30% or income and 30% of wealth from armed
citizenry. IOW, the welfare state was result of an armed peaceful revolution.
The
leaders, eminent intellectuals and elitemen worry of only two things : recall and guns and
nothing else. They dont fear loss of face, loss of
reputation, they dont give a damn about inner voice,
they dont care about miseries of us dying commons.
E.g. in 1940s, even 40 lakh commons starved to death, the eminent intellectuals
and elitemen used to eat and drink lavishly and did
not bother. Even today, when per capita pulse consumption decreased by 25% and
per capita grain consumption decreased by 10% in 1991-2008, you see leaders,
eminent intellectuals and elitemen demanding more
IITs, more IIMs, more JNU, more UGC, more flyways, more skyways, more airports,
better airports, better ports, more SEZs etc.. When you talk about lakhs of
infants dying each year for want of medicine/food barely worth Rs 1000 per year, the leaders, eminent intellectuals and elitemen of India talk about Liberalization, Privatization,
Globalization, Rising India, Shining India, Feel Good Factor, Incredible India,
8% growth rate group song. If Rome has one Nero, over 98% of leaders, eminent
intellectuals and elitemen of India are Nero. The
American elitemen did not show such Nerogiri as 70%
commons had guns. The Indian leaders, eminent intellectuals and elitemen act like Nero as not even 2% commons in bottom 95%
of commons have guns. So “Let them starve and let us cherish” is the motto of
Indian elitemen, Indian leaders and Indian eminent
intellectuals.
So
Americans had recall at District/State level and not National level. But an
armed citizenry acted as surrogate of recall at National level. We in India do
not have armed citizenry. There are people like Naxals
who believe that weapons are ONLY way to get rid of poverty. I support weaponization of us commons, but insist on “Right to
Recall” to solve the poverty problem, and not use of weapons as the primary
method. The commons might starve to death as they did in 1940s in Bengal or
they might use weapons as in Russia in 1916 or threat of use of weapons may create a welfare state as it did
in 1932 in USA. But those are the ways I would not suggest as of now. I want to
try the “Right To Recall” way rather than use weapons against leaders, eminent
intellectuals and elitemen.
So re-answering the question : How come citizens’
plight in West improved in 1932-39 despite no recall procedures at National
level? Answer is : because 70% of Americans had guns. As of now, bottom
98% of Indians do not have guns. I do want a Swiss like India, where 100%
citizens have guns, but that is to protect India from possible invasion of
Pakistan, China, USUK etc., not to solve poverty, corruption problem issue. For
poverty, corruption problem, I prefer use of “Right To Recall PM, CM, judges
etc.”
Summarizing
: West did not need recall at National level as they had armed citizenry. We do
not have armed citizenry as of now, and so we have to have recall procedures at
National, State and District levels.
West
improved because of expulsion procedures (Juries or recall procedures) and
because citizenry was armed to teeth. These were the ONLY two sources of
improvement of the citizens of West. And Indian eminent intellectuals have
opposed both., i.e. they have opposed arming citizenry of India as well as they have opposed recall/Jury.
IOW, eminent intellectuals of India have ensured that citizenry of India remain
weak, docile and poor and then they throw the blame on a myth called as
“Political Culture”.
At this point, I would like the reader to note
that series of lies and half truths that Indian “eminent intellectuals” throw
before students.
1. The Indian eminent
intellectuals do not give any information wrt the
fact that police in Europe improved only after Coroner’s Jury System came
wherein citizens had means to expel an atrocious officer came in 950 AD and
Jury System came in 1100 AD. Only
after this Jury System, atrocities of policemen decreased and this reduced this
ability to fleece commons. And it was only after and right after Coroner’s Jury
System, that prosperity of Europe started increased.
2. The Indian eminent intellectuals do not give
any information to activists, students wrt the fact
that most important reason why District and State administration in US is low
corrupt is widespread use of Jury and Right to Recall. They spread lies that
difference is due to political culture.
3. The Indian eminent
intellectuals do not give any information to activists, students wrt the fact that Federal Govt in
US in 1930s created a welfare state only
because citizenry was armed to teeth. In addition, Indian eminent intellectuals
have created a myth that welfare system in 1930s came because of “mature
citizenry” there by there by throwing the blame of all miseries on the citizens
of India.
Essentially,
Indian eminent intellectuals insist on retaining Bonsai-ness of the Indian
democracy – no recall, no Jury, no elections in executive and judiciary and no
weapons to us commons. And when the lack of democraticness
creates poverty deaths, corruption and weak Military, they promptly blame the
us commons and our Political Culture, Religion etc..
NO.
Pls see draft of RTR District Police Chief. In the
draft, the citizens of State can cancel RTR District Police Chief for 5 years
or more. So say 2-3 districts in WB have Bangladeshi majority. Then using State
level TCP, CM or citizens can cancel RTR District Police Chief in those
districts, expel Bangladeshies and then put RTR
District Police Chief procedure in place. Likewise, citizens of India can
suspend RTR in a State using National-level TCP and then install RTR in that
State after secessionists and terrorists
are neutralized.
All
MPs in Congress, BJP, CPM, CPI have opposed RTR-PM. Even opposition MPs such as
Subramanian Swamy have opposed RTR-PM. Subramanian Swamy openly said in several TV-interviews that “Right to
Recall is nonsense”. And almost all eminent intellectuals oppose RTR-PM. They
all insist that citizens must have no procedure to replace PM. These
politicians and eminent intellectuals oppose RTR-PM because these politicians
get cash or media-sponsorship from MNC-owners, Missionaries and Indian elitemen and they all oppose RTR-PM.
The
activist leader such as The Anna and Chhote Anne have
all also opposed RTR-PM. They oppose RTR-PM because they heavily depend on
MNC-owners, Indian elitemen and Missionaries for
media coverage. The MNC-owners, Missionaries etc. are paying TV-channel-owners
to cover these activist-leaders. And they all know that they will lose media
coverage if they were to support RTR-PM, and so The Anna and Chhote Anne have all opposed RTR-PM
All
in all, all MPs, MLAs, eminent intellectuals and activist leaders oppose RTR-PM
because they rightly fear that elitemen and
Missionaries will stop supporting them if they were to support RTR-PM.
Please
send order to PM and Loksabha Speaker via SMS that
your Yes\No sent via SMS on any bill presented in the Parliament should be
posted on the website of Parliament. Pls send order
to PM via SMS to print TCP-draft and also RTR-PM-via-SMS draft I the Gazette.
Please also read chap-13 of this book http://rahulmehta.com/301.htm . It has
several steps where-in you can spend 6 hours a week and help to bring RTR-PM
draft in Gazette in India. The steps involve sending necessary orders to PM,
MPs etc. via SMS, distributing pamphlets, informing citizens on motives of
leaders such Congress MPs, BJP MPs, The Anna etc. who oppose RTR-PM, giving
newspaper ads, contesting elections on RTR, MRCM, TCP etc.. Once TCP gets
printed in Gazette, MRCM will get printed in 1-2 months.
I
propose printing RTR-PM-draft after printing TCP-draft, and I am not in favor
of mass-movement for RTR-PM-draft. Why?
Because
if activists initiate mass-movement on RTR-PM-draft, then MPs and eminent
intellectuals who oppose RTR-PM-draft will get opportunity to debate upon every
clause of RTR-PM-draft and make 10s of petty good-looking but useless
variations such (i)recall should not be within first
6 months (ii)there can be only one recall in 2 years (iii)the threshold for
recall should be lower or higher etc. etc.. … and many more. Once TCP gets
printed in Gazette, each suggestion can be refuted by “yes, pls
submit affidavit demanding that change” and given the useless of these
suggestions, all the suggestions will fall flat. But in absence of TCP, given
that opponents of RTR-PM have more money to pay mediamen
and activist leaders, they will prevail with their useless suggestions in media
and activism. But it is difficult for them to oppose TCP, because anyone who
oppose TCP can be called as someone who wants to suppresses the voice of dalits, women, commons etc. and can be made to bad look.
And so it is easier ask activists to ask their activist-leaders to support TCP
and if the activist-leader refuses, then expose him before his activists. This
way, it decreases the support of corrupt-activist-leaders and increases support
for TCP-draft.
Let
me re-state. In RTR-movement, one important goal is to convince more and more
non-80G-activists to spend time on RTR-drafts. Now non-80G-activists will never
go towards leaders of Congress, BJP, CPM etc. as they are all already exposed.
But they are likely to have become followers of activist-leaders like The Anna
etc. because these activist-leaders get huge positive coverage from paid-mediamen. The recallists will
need to put a proposal before The Anna etc. that would The Anna refuses or
evades without giving any excuses that his own activists like. If MRCM-draft is
put, then activist leader can refuse and evade the proposal by citing “he is
changing topic” as excuse, and an excuse that many of his activists will
accept. But TCP-clauses are something that can be added to any proposal (like Janlokpal) and non-80G-activists can be convinced to
support it, without facing allegation of “topic change”. So it is easier to get
activists’ support on TCP-clauses and thus convince him that his activist
leader is fake.
So
IMO, it will be more time efficient to campaign for (TCP-draft via mass-movement,
and MRCM-draft via TCP-draft) proposal amongst activists than campaign for
MRCM-draft via mass-movement proposal.
I
will discuss this issue of TCP-draft first or MRCM-draft first issue in more
detail in chap-13.
Review questions
1. Say there are 7 crore
registered voters in a State. Say CM has support of 200 MLAs who had obtained
say 2 crore votes. Say CM has direct approval of say 1.5 cr
citizens. Then how many Approvals would a person need to displace CM, as per
the Gazette Notifications we have proposed to replace CM?
2. Say there are 7cr
registered voters in a State. Say CM has support of 200 MLAs who had obtained
say 2 cr votes.
Say CM has approval of 2.2 cr citizens. Then
how many Approvals would a person need to displace CM?
3. How many persons can
a citizens Approve, as per the GN MRCM
Party demands?
4. Say 3 crore citizens
file approvals. Then say 50 lakh cancel their approvals. What is the total fees
collected?
5. What is the filing
fee to for CM position?
Exercises
1. Please obtain drafts
of Right to Recall procedures Jay Prakash Narayan submitted to his colleagues
to be submitted in the Parliament.
2. Please obtain drafts
of Right to Recall procedures Shourie or other BJP
MPs submitted in the Parliament.
3. Please obtain drafts
of RTR procedures Yechuri or other CPM MPs submitted
in the Parliament.
4. Please obtain drafts
of RTR procedures MMS or other Congress MPs submitted in the Parliament.
5. Do you agree with
above drafts submitted by any of these MPs?
6. Do you agree with recall
draft Jayaprakash Narayan had submitted in Parliament
to create recall procedure he had promised in the election? who know, and
meet/call and find out why they oppose the First MRCM demand.
7. Explain why you think
eminent intellectuals of India oppose drafts to recall CMs, PM?